Blog
The Art of Not Being a Micromanaging Monster: Why Business Supervising Skills Matter More Than Your MBA
Related Reading:
Three months ago, I watched a perfectly competent project manager reduce a seasoned electrician to tears in front of his entire crew. Not because the work was wrong – it was actually spot-on – but because the supervisor couldn't handle the fact that the job got done differently than his precious flowchart demanded.
That's when it hit me: we've got supervision all wrong in this country.
After seventeen years bouncing between construction sites, corporate offices, and everything in between, I've seen more supervisory disasters than a workplace safety inspector having nightmares. The problem isn't that people don't know how to do their jobs. The problem is we keep promoting good workers into supervision roles without teaching them the most fundamental skill of all: how to get out of people's way while still being useful.
The Great Australian Supervision Paradox
Here's something that'll ruffle some feathers: most of what they teach you in business supervisory training courses is backwards. They start with policies, procedures, and performance metrics. Dead wrong. You start with understanding that every person you supervise is basically running their own small business within your business.
Think about it. That apprentice plumber? He's got his reputation, his skills, his tools, and his pride all wrapped up in every joint he sweats. Your job isn't to babysit him through every step – it's to give him the resources and support to make his small business successful within your bigger one.
But here's where most supervisors stuff it up completely.
They think supervision means constant oversight. Wrong. They think it means having all the answers. Also wrong. They think it means being the smartest person in the room. Catastrophically wrong.
The best supervisor I ever worked under was this bloke named Terry who ran a small manufacturing outfit in Geelong. Terry's secret? He spent 80% of his time removing obstacles and only 20% actually supervising. Brilliant.
The Four Pillars of Not Stuffing It Up
Pillar One: Become an Obstacle Remover
Your primary job description should read: "Professional Obstacle Remover and Occasional Decision Maker." That's it. Everything else is just noise.
When Sarah from accounts needs approval for a $47 purchase order, don't make her wait three days while you "consider it." When the delivery truck can't find the back entrance, don't tell the driver to "figure it out." When the client changes requirements for the fifteenth time this month, don't just pass that stress straight down to your team.
Remove. The. Obstacles.
I learned this the hard way after spending six months as the world's worst site supervisor. I was so busy checking everyone's work that I forgot to check whether they actually had what they needed to do good work in the first place. Revolutionary concept, I know.
Pillar Two: Master the Art of Strategic Ignorance
This might be the most controversial thing I'll say today: good supervisors deliberately don't know how to do everything their team does.
Controversial? Absolutely. True? You bet it is.
When you know exactly how to tile a bathroom, you can't help but watch your tiler and mentally critique every movement. When you don't know the intricacies of database management, you focus on outcomes instead of methods. Which approach do you think gets better results?
The moment you accept that your people might actually know their jobs better than you do, supervision becomes about facilitating excellence rather than enforcing compliance. Game changer.
Pillar Three: Develop Allergic Reactions to Meetings
Seventy-three percent of workplace meetings could be replaced with a well-written email. The other twenty-seven percent could be replaced with a five-minute conversation in the hallway.
If you're holding weekly team meetings to "touch base" and "see how everyone's going," you're doing supervision wrong. Good supervision happens in real-time, at the point of work, when people actually need support.
The best supervisory conversation I ever had lasted thirty-seven seconds: "How's the Johnson project going?" "Good, but I'm worried about the timeline if they change the specs again." "What do you need from me?" "Heads up to the client about potential delays if changes keep coming." "Done. Anything else?" "Nah, we're sweet."
Thirty-seven seconds. Problem identified, solution agreed, action assigned. No PowerPoint required.
Pillar Four: Become a Translation Service
Here's something they don't teach you in leadership training: half your job is translation.
Upper management speaks in quarterly targets and strategic initiatives. Your team speaks in daily problems and practical solutions. You're the translator between these two completely different languages.
When the regional manager says "we need to optimise operational efficiency," you translate that to "they want us to work smarter, not harder, so let's figure out what's slowing us down."
When your best technician says "this new system is garbage," you translate that back up as "we're experiencing some user adoption challenges with the new platform that might benefit from additional training resources."
Translation. Not manipulation, not spin – just honest translation between different workplace dialects.
The Uncomfortable Truth About Authority
Most people think authority comes from job titles and org charts. Wrong again.
Real supervisory authority comes from being genuinely useful to the people you supervise. When you consistently remove obstacles, provide resources, and translate between management levels, people start coming to you with problems before they become disasters.
That's authority. Not because you can fire people, but because you can help them succeed.
I once worked with a site supervisor who had no formal authority whatsoever – he was technically just another tradesman. But when problems arose, everyone went to him first. Why? Because he had a track record of actually solving things instead of just escalating them.
Six months later, management made his role official. They were basically just acknowledging what everyone already knew.
Where Most Supervisors Go Wrong (And Why)
The biggest mistake? Thinking that supervision is about control instead of coordination.
You don't control skilled workers – they're not machines. You coordinate them, support them, and occasionally redirect them when external circumstances change.
I see supervisors trying to control delivery schedules when they should be coordinating with suppliers. I see them trying to control quality outcomes when they should be coordinating training resources. I see them trying to control team morale when they should be coordinating workload distribution.
Control is exhausting and ultimately ineffective. Coordination is sustainable and actually works.
The second biggest mistake? Believing that good supervision requires constant visibility.
Your team doesn't need to see you supervising them. They need to feel the effects of good supervision: smoother workflows, fewer unnecessary interruptions, clearer communication, and resources available when needed.
The best supervisors are often nearly invisible during normal operations. They become highly visible only when problems arise or when team members need support.
The Economics of Good Supervision
Here's a fact that'll make your accountant happy: good supervision is incredibly cost-effective.
Poor supervision costs money in obvious ways – higher turnover, lower productivity, increased mistakes. But it also costs money in hidden ways that most businesses never track properly.
How much does it cost when your best electrician spends an hour looking for materials that should have been ordered last week? How much when a client meeting gets postponed because three different departments weren't coordinated? How much when good people leave because they're tired of working around supervisory incompetence?
Good supervision prevents these costs before they show up on any spreadsheet.
But here's the thing most businesses miss: investing in proper supervisory skills development pays returns immediately. Not quarterly, not annually – immediately.
When supervisors stop creating unnecessary work for their teams, productivity jumps overnight. When they start removing obstacles instead of adding them, efficiency improvements show up in the next week's numbers.
Getting Started (Without Overthinking It)
If you're ready to stop being part of the problem, here's where to start:
Week One: Stop checking completed work unless there's a specific reason to suspect problems. Trust but verify has it backwards – verify but trust.
Week Two: Start asking "What do you need from me?" instead of "How's it going?" Change the conversation from reporting to resource allocation.
Week Three: Identify the three biggest recurring obstacles your team faces and eliminate one of them. Just one. Then eliminate another one next week.
Week Four: Have individual conversations with each team member about what makes their job harder than it needs to be. Don't defend current systems – just listen and take notes.
That's it. Four weeks to fundamentally change how you approach supervision.
Will some things slip through the cracks initially? Probably. Will your overall team performance improve dramatically? Absolutely.
The goal isn't perfection – it's creating an environment where good people can do their best work without fighting the system every step of the way.
Because at the end of the day, that's what business supervising skills really are: the ability to get out of people's way while still being genuinely helpful.
Simple concept. Just not easy to execute consistently.
But then again, most valuable skills aren't.
Further Resources: